October 04, 2023 Last Updated: September 11, 2025 by Anthony Riccio
When someone is arrested in Massachusetts, one of the first questions families ask is whether the person will be released before trial. Bail and pretrial detention decisions are made quickly, but they carry serious consequences. In some cases, a defendant is allowed to return home while their case moves forward. In others, the court may order them held in jail until trial.
An experienced Massachusetts criminal defense lawyer can guide you through this process, explain how judges make these decisions, and advocate for fair bail or release conditions. With new proposals like the “Dangerousness Bill” on the table, it’s especially important to understand how the law works and what rights defendants have at this stage of a case.
Before looking at new reforms, it’s important to understand how bail and pretrial detention currently work in Massachusetts. These two processes determine whether a defendant waits for trial at home or behind bars.
Bail allows someone accused of a crime to be released from jail while awaiting trial. The purpose of bail is to ensure that the defendant returns to court. When setting bail, judges look at several factors, such as the seriousness of the crime, the defendant’s criminal record, and how closely they are connected to their community.
Pretrial detention happens when someone is held in jail before their trial. This can occur if the charges are severe or if the court thinks the defendant might not return to court.
For example, Sam Bankman-Fried, the founder of a cryptocurrency exchange, was denied bail and held in pretrial detention. Understanding when and why pretrial detention occurs can help you prepare for what to expect.
The proposed legislation is designed to close gaps in the current system and expand judicial authority. Here’s what it means in practice.
The main goal of the Dangerousness Bill is to keep dangerous individuals off the streets while they wait for trial. The bill focuses on reducing the risk to public safety by closely monitoring defendants and making it harder for those who pose a threat to be released on bail.
The bill also aims to address gaps in the current pretrial system, where dangerous individuals may be released due to outdated rules or insufficient monitoring.
Judges don’t set bail randomly, they follow legal guidelines and weigh several factors before making a decision.
When a judge sets bail, they consider:
At a bail hearing, a judge listens to both the defense and prosecution to decide if bail should be granted and at what amount. They will consider factors such as:
These factors help the court assess whether the defendant is likely to return for their trial or if they pose a risk to public safety.
If passed, the new bill would change how judges evaluate pretrial detention and expand the use of dangerousness hearings.
One of the major changes in the Dangerousness Bill is the expansion of dangerousness hearings. These hearings would allow judges to assess whether a defendant is too dangerous to be released.
Under the new bill, more cases would qualify for these hearings, ensuring that individuals who pose a threat to public safety remain in custody.
The bill also gives judges more power to make decisions about whether someone should be held in pretrial detention. This added discretion will allow judges to look at each case more closely, considering the unique circumstances of each defendant.
Bail is not just about money, it often comes with rules that must be followed. These conditions can make the difference between staying out or going back to jail.
Bail conditions are rules that defendants must follow while they are out on bail. These conditions could include regularly checking in with a probation officer, avoiding contact with certain people, or staying within a specific area.
Violating bail conditions can have serious consequences. If a defendant breaks these rules, they may be re-arrested and could face additional charges. Common violations include missing court dates, traveling without permission, or getting into further legal trouble while out on bail.
Supporters of the bill highlight public safety, while critics raise concerns about constitutional rights. Both sides bring important perspectives.
The Dangerousness Bill proposes stricter rules for enforcing bail conditions. This means that defendants who violate the terms of their release will face harsher penalties, including being immediately taken back into custody. The goal is to ensure that defendants remain compliant while out on bail.
Although the bill aims to protect the public, some people worry that it could infringe on defendants’ rights. For instance, defendants are presumed innocent until proven guilty, and critics argue that the bill could lead to unnecessary detention of individuals who pose no threat to the community.
Even with new laws, every defendant has constitutional protections. Understanding these rights is critical during pretrial proceedings.
If you’ve been accused of a crime, you have specific rights under Massachusetts law, including:
Legal reforms often spark debate, and this bill is no exception. Critics point out the potential social and financial consequences of its expansion.
One concern about the Dangerousness Bill is that it may disproportionately affect marginalized groups, such as people of color or low-income individuals. These groups are already more likely to face higher bail amounts or be denied bail altogether, and the bill could exacerbate these issues.
Some critics worry that the bill could lead to overcrowding in jails. If more people are held in pretrial detention, the state may face rising costs for housing and managing these individuals. This could strain the criminal justice system in the long run.
Defendants and their attorneys still have tools to push for release before trial. Here are two common approaches.
If you or your loved one can’t afford bail, it’s possible to request a bail reduction hearing. At this hearing, the judge will reconsider the bail amount based on new information, such as the defendant’s financial situation or the circumstances of the case.
A surety bond is another way to secure release. With this option, a bail bondsman agrees to pay the bail amount if the defendant fails to appear in court. While this can help someone who can’t afford to pay bail upfront, it comes with responsibilities, such as paying a non-refundable fee to the bondsman.
The bill has not yet become law. It remains under debate in the Massachusetts Legislature, and its final form could look different from today’s proposal.
The Dangerousness Bill is still working its way through the legislative process. As lawmakers debate its pros and cons, advocacy groups and legal professionals are paying close attention.
If Massachusetts passes the Dangerousness Bill, it could set an example for other states considering similar reforms. As the nation grapples with issues of criminal justice reform, Massachusetts could be at the forefront of this debate.
The bail and pretrial process can be one of the most stressful parts of a criminal case. Decisions made at this stage often determine whether someone spends weeks or months at home with family or behind bars awaiting trial. Having clear guidance and strong advocacy matters.
At Riccio Law, clients work directly with Attorney Anthony Riccio. Every case receives his personal attention, with a focus on preparation, communication, and protecting the rights of the individual involved. If you or someone close to you is facing pretrial detention, it’s important to get advice you can trust and a defense built around your situation.